Key result
The Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway produced a significantly greater and more sustained haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response compared to the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway.
Why the study?
Does the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway produce a greater haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response than the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in patients undergoing anaesthesia?
RCT (n=36)
randomised
Does the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway produce a greater haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response than the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in patients undergoing anaesthesia?
The Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway produces a greater haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response compared to the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, which may be relevant for patients with cardiovascular disease.
Laryngeal Tube-Suction may increase risk in cardiovascular patients; confirms greater stress response than ProSeal LMA in anesthesia.
Supraglottic airway devices such as the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) and Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway (LTS) that provoke the least stress responses could be beneficial in many situations, especially in patients with cardiovascular disease. We compared the haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response of the LTS and PLMA in a randomised study of 36 patients. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were all reduced following induction of anaesthesia with no significant differences between the two groups. Following insertion of LTS, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels increased to pre-induction levels. However, following the insertion of the PLMA, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels remained significantly lower than pre-induction values. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate and epinephrine were significantly greater in the LTS group than in the PLMA group. We conclude that the LTS produces a greater and more sustained haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response than does the PLMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahaba et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing anaesthesia (n=36). Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway (LTS) vs. ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) was evaluated on Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine, and norepinephrine levels). The Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway produced a significantly greater and more sustained haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response compared to the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: