PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate compressive and tensile stresses in porcelain and composite at the labial marginal region of porcelain veneer restorations using chamfer, shoulder, or knife-edge labial margin designs with labial window or incisal overlap incisal preparation designs. METHODS: Porcelain veneer models were constructed and loaded with (1) a 200-N, 45 degrees palatal load to simulate functional loading, and (2) a horizontal labial loading of 200 N to mimic trauma. Maximum tensile and compressive stresses were recorded within the labial marginal region of both porcelain and composite lute. RESULTS: Under the 45 degrees palatal load, stresses within the palatal marginal porcelain were chiefly compressive, and stresses for the knife-edge designs as much as 42% less than for shoulder designs. Incisal overlap preparations were generally associated with less compressive stress within both porcelain and composite than the window preparation. When a labial load was applied, tensile stresses were as much as 25 times greater for the chamfer and shoulder designs compared with the knife-edge design. Labial loading also resulted in an increase in tensile stresses within the composite lute, and stresses were again lowest within the knife-edge margin design. CONCLUSIONS: Under the limitations of this study, using the incisal overlap preparation, porcelain veneers with knife-edge labial margins could better sustain occlusal loading without fracture. J Prosthodont 2001;10:16-21.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seymour et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: