Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two ketolides, telithromycin and HMR 3004, were evaluated for their in vitro activity against erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae. On the basis of their resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics, erythromycin-resistant test strains were assigned to the constitutive resistance (cMLS) phenotype, the inducible resistance (iMLS) phenotype or the M phenotype. iMLS S. pyogenes strains were further subdivided into the three recently described subtypes iMLS-A, -B and -C. Telithromycin and HMR 3004 were uniformly and highly active against pneumococci (regardless of their susceptibility or resistance to erythromycin and/or penicillin), erythromycin-susceptible S. pyogenes and erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes strains of the M phenotype (in which resistance is mediated by an efflux system) or iMLS-B or -C phenotype (in which resistance is mediated by a methylase encoded by the ermTR gene). Both ketolides were less active against erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes strains with the cMLS phenotype or the iMLS-A subtype (where resistance is mediated by a methylase encoded by the ermAM gene), these strains ranging in phenotype from the upper limits of susceptibility to low-level resistant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eleonora Giovanetti (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: