AbstractCooperation, the mutual benefit that individuals of different species obtain when interacting, is ubiquitous in nature. Despite their prevalence, we know little about the mechanisms particular to cooperation that maintain biodiversity. To address this gap, we introduce cooperation into structural stability, a general framework for understanding how species interactions determine the long-term persistence of species within communities. This approach allows the identification of three distinct processes. First, cooperation increases the opportunities for species to coexist more than interspecific competition does, improving species persistence across a wider range of environmental conditions. Second, cooperation creates intertwined biodiversity, where the existence of some species begets the presence of others. Third, cooperation promotes alternative structures of community assembly due to variations in species' performance. These structures diversify the pathways to species coexistence. In conclusion, our work suggests that cooperation, relative to interspecific competition, maximizes the maintenance of biodiversity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godoy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: