Key result
Rate versus rhythm control strategies for postoperative atrial fibrillation generally result in equivalent patient outcomes.
Why the study?
Do rate versus rhythm control strategies differ in patient outcomes for postoperative atrial fibrillation after non-cardiothoracic surgery?
Population
Patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation following non-cardiothoracic surgery
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May guide individualized management in stable cases; leaves open need for prospective trials after non-cardiothoracic surgery.
Do rate versus rhythm control strategies differ in patient outcomes for postoperative atrial fibrillation after non-cardiothoracic surgery?
Rate and rhythm control strategies offer equivalent outcomes for stable postoperative atrial fibrillation, with treatment choice tailored to patient comorbidities and preferences.
Bekker et al. (2011) conducted a review in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation. Rate versus rhythm control was evaluated. Rate versus rhythm control strategies for postoperative atrial fibrillation generally result in equivalent patient outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: