Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The problem is addressed of assessing realistic confidence limits for oncogenic transformation rates when the incidence of transformation is small, and there is a background present. It is shown that the commonly used approximations for assessing the confidence interval on the radiation-induced transformation rate (t1) and the control rate (t2) are inadequate when only a small number of transformants are observed. Accurate techniques are described for these cases for the estimation of confidence limits of t1, t2 and also t1-t2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brenner et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: