Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LAP-ISR) for rectal cancer in terms of morbidity, oncological outcomes, and functional results. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with primary low rectal cancer cT1-T2 underwent LAP-ISR. Surgical outcomes, pathological results, postoperative complications, oncological outcomes, and functional results were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Three patients (8.1%) had carcinoma in situ, 22 (59.5%) had pT1 tumor, and 11 (29.7%) had pT2 tumor. Eleven patients (29.7%) were diagnosed as being node positive, while 26 (70.3%) had node-negative disease. The median operative time was 315 min (range: 195-502). The median blood loss was 37 ml (range: 0-745). One case was converted to open surgery. Pathological complete resection was achieved in all cases. There was no surgical mortality. Postoperative complications of grade III-IV on the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed in 16.2% of the patients. The median follow-up period was 2.8 years (range: 187-2,241 days), and 3-year disease-free survival was 93.1%. No patient developed local recurrence. The functional result was objectively good. CONCLUSION: LAP-ISR can be recommended as a feasible, ultimate sphincter-preserving procedure with acceptable functional and intermediate-term oncological outcomes in patients with cT1-T2 very low rectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiomi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: