We present a survey for low-ionization metal absorption line systems toward 17 QSOs at redshifts z em = 5.8–6.4. Nine of our objects were observed at high resolution with either Keck/HIRES or Magellan/MIKE, and the remainder at moderate resolution with Keck/ESI. The survey spans 5.3 < z abs < 6.4 and has a path length interval Δ X = 39.5 or Δ z = 8.0. In total we detect ten systems, five of which are new discoveries. The line-of-sight number density, ℓ( X ) = 0.25 +0.21 − 0.13 (95% confidence), is consistent with the combined number density at z ∼ 3 of damped Lyα systems (DLAs) and sub-DLAs, which comprise the main population of low-ionization systems at lower redshifts. This apparent lack of evolution may occur because low-ionization systems are hosted by lower-mass halos at higher redshifts, or because the mean cross section of low-ionization gas at a given halo mass increases with redshift due to the higher densities and lower ionizing background. The roughly constant number density notably contrasts with the sharp decline at z > 5.3 in the number density of highly ionized systems traced by C iv . The low-ionization systems at z ∼ 6 span a similar range of velocity widths as lower-redshift sub-DLAs but have significantly weaker lines at a given width. This may imply that the mass–metallicity relation of the host galaxies evolves toward lower metallicities at higher redshifts. These systems lack strong Si iv and C iv , which are common among lower-redshift DLAs and sub-DLAs. This is consistent, however, with a similar decrease in the metallicity of the low- and high-ionization phases, and does not necessarily indicate a lack of nearby, highly ionized gas. The high number density of low-ionization systems at z ∼ 6 suggests that we may be detecting galaxies below the current limits of i -dropout and Lyα emission galaxy surveys. These systems may therefore be the first direct probes of the "typical" galaxies responsible for hydrogen reionization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Becker et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: