Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 15, 2016Journal of Applied Toxicology

Accounting for data variability, a key factor in in vivo/in vitro relationships: application to the skin sensitization potency (in vivo LLNA versus in vitro DPRA) example

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SDS. DimitrovBulgarian Academy of SciencesADAnn DetroyerL'Oréal (France)CPCécile PiroirdL'Oréal (France)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Dimitrov et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9c6d2a80b31b2c0d76deedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3318
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS. II1936 · 297 citations
  2. 2The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation2007 · 112 citations
  3. 3A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin‐sensitization testing2004 · 151 citations
  4. 4Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods2005 · 408 citations
  5. 5Quantification of Chemical Peptide Reactivity for Screening Contact Allergens: A Classification Tree Model Approach2007 · 399 citations