Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Purpose: To review the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in diagnosis and management of vitreomacular disease and the impact of OCT on potential uses of ocriplasmin, a new pharmacologic vitreolysis agent recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion. Methods: Analysis of current literature regarding OCT in diagnosis and management of vitreomacular interface disease. Results: Posterior vitreous detachment is typically a nonpathologic age-related event. Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment emerges when the vitreous cortex fails to cleanly detach from the macula, optic nerve, or other adherent sites. Focal vitreomacular adhesion is a nonpathologic anatomical designation associated with perifoveal posterior vitreous detachment but normal retinal morphology on OCT. Vitreomacular traction is a pathologic consequence of persistent vitreous attachment with structural disturbance of the macular retina visible on OCT. Full-thickness macular holes are foveal defects continuous through all retinal layers to the retinal pigment epithelium. Vitreomacular traction and macular hole with focal vitreomacular adhesion are indications for pharmacologic vitreolysis. Conclusion: Noninvasive high-resolution OCT imaging has transformed the understanding of vitreomacular interface disease. Careful evaluation of the vitreomacular interface with OCT has increased in importance with the introduction of ocriplasmin for vitreomacular adhesion associated with symptomatic anatomical retinal changes. Advancements in medical imaging technology continue to enhance the ability to diagnose and manage patients with vitreoretinal diseases. This has become increasingly relevant clinically with recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of ocriplasmin, a pharmacologic vitreolysis agent indicated for the treatment of patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stalmans et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: