Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective registry analysis finds lower-volume centers request heart transplant Status 2 exceptions significantly more often, indicating center-dependent variation in organ allocation practices.
OBJECTIVE: There are limited data examining the relationship between transplant center volume and their use of Status 2 exceptions for heart transplant (OHT). METHODS: A retrospective review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database identified all patients undergoing OHT under Status 2 exception between late 2018 and early 2023. Demographics were collected and transplant centers were categorized based on the number of OHT performed annually (very low volume = < 5 OHT per year; low volume = 5-24 OHT per year; medium volume = 25-50 OHT per year, high volume = > 50 OHT per year). RESULTS: Across all centers, 6348 OHT were included, with n = 68 performed at very low volume centers, n = 1001 performed at low volume centers, n = 1834 performed at medium volume centers, and n = 3445 performed at high volume centers. Medium and high volume centers applied for at least one Status 2 exception about 30%-35% of the time, compared to 50%-60% of the time observed at very low and low volume centers. Compared to very low volume centers, medium volume centers applied for half the amount of Status 2 exceptions (IRR = 0.52 [0.35-0.76]; p < 0.001) while high volume centers applied for less than half the amount (IRR = 0.42 [0.29-0.62]; p < 0.001). High-volume centers were also 18% less likely to apply for exceptions than medium-volume centers (IRR = 0.82 [0.74-0.91]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower volume transplant centers apply for Status 2 exceptions at a significantly higher rate, with a stepwise decrease in exception use with increasing transplant center volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thornhill et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: