Monolithic polymeric supports have been prepared by electron-beam-triggered free-radical polymerization using a mixture of glycidyl methacrylate and trimethylolpropane triacrylate in 2-propanol, 1-dodecanol, and toluene. Under appropriate conditions, phase separation occurred, which resulted in the formation of a porous monolithic matrix that was characterized by large (convective) pores in the 30 μm range as well as pores of <600 nm. The epoxy groups in pores of >7 nm were hydrolyzed by using poly(styrenesulfonic acid) (Mw = 69,400 g mol(-1), PDI=2.4). The remaining epoxy groups inside pores of <7 nm were subjected to aminolysis with norborn-5-en-2-ylmethylamine (2) and provided covalently bound norborn-2-ene (NBE) groups inside these pores. These NBE groups were then treated with the first-generation Grubbs initiator [RuCl2 (PCy3 )2 (CHPh)]. These immobilized Ru-alkylidenes were further used for the surface modification of the small pores by a grafting approach. A series of monomers, that is, 7-oxanorborn-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic anhydride (3), norborn-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic anhydride (4), N,N-di-2-pyridyl-7-oxanorborn-5-ene-2-carboxylic amide (5), N,N-di-2-pyridylnorborn-5-ene-2-carboxamide (6), N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2-carboxamide (7), and dimethyl bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-en-2-ylphosphonate (8), were used for this purpose. Finally, monoliths functionalized with poly-5 graft polymers were used to permanently immobilize Pd(2+) and Pt(4+), respectively, inside the pores. After reduction, metal nanoparticles 2 nm in diameter were formed. The palladium-nanoparticle-loaded monoliths were used in both Heck- and Suzuki-type coupling reactions achieving turnover numbers of up to 167,000 and 63,000, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bandari et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: