Summary Two simple cases of two-dimensional supersonic flow were investigated by schlieren photography, viz. the flow in two consecutive corners and the flow over a circular-arc profile concave to the stream. The flows were photographed for smooth and rough surfaces of the models, i.e. with laminar and turbulent boundary layers, and the observed flow-patterns are compared with those predicted by inviscid theory. The flow with a turbulent boundary layer was in good agreement with inviscid theory outside the boundary layer, whereas the laminar boundary layer separated and a shock wave originated at the point of separation, in both cases the agreement was good at points far from the surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. H. Johannesen (1952) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: