This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Context. Supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) are a subclass of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) in which a compact object accretes part of the clumpy wind of the blue supergiant companion, triggering series of brief X-ray flares lasting a few kiloseconds. Currently, only about 15 SFXTs are known. Aims. The EXTraS (Exploring the X-ray Transient and variable Sky) catalog provides the timing signatures of every source observed by the EPIC instrument onboard XMM-Newton. Among the most peculiar sources in terms of variability, we identified a new member of the SFXT family: 4XMM J181330.1−175110 (J1813). Methods. We analyzed all publicly available XMM-Newton, Chandra, Swift, and NuSTAR data pointed at the J1813 position to determine the source’s duty cycle and to provide a comprehensive description of its timing and spectral behavior during its active phase. Additionally, we searched for the optical and infrared counterpart of the X-ray source in public databases and fitted its spectral energy distribution (SED). Results. The optical-to-mid infrared SED of J1813 is consistent with a highly absorbed (AV ∼ 38) B0 star at ∼10 kpc. During its X-ray active phase, the source is characterized by continuous thousands seconds-long flares with peak luminosities (2–12 keV) ranging from 1034 to 4 × 1035 erg s−1. Its X-ray spectrum is consistent with a high-absorbed power-law model with NH ∼ 1.8 × 1023 cm−2 and Γ ∼ 1.66. No spectral variability was observed as a function of time or flux. J1813 is in a quiescent state ∼60% of the time, with an upper-limit luminosity of 8 × 1032 erg s−1 (at 10 kpc), implying an observed long-term X-ray flux variability > 500. Conclusions. The optical counterpart alone indicates J1813 is an HMXB. Its transient nature, duty cycle, the amplitude of observed X-ray variability, the shape and luminosity of the X-ray flares – and the lack of known X-ray outbursts (> 1036 erg s−1) – strongly support the identification of J1813 as an SFXT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marelli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: