Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The chemical structure of fluoxetine, (±)-N-methyl-3-phenyl-3-[(α,α,α-trifluoro-p-tolyl)oxy]propylamine, as shown in Fig. 1, lacks the three-fused ring system contained in tricyclic antidepressant drugs (TCAs) such as imipramine and amitriptyline. Thep-trifluoromethyl substituent on the phenoxy ring of fluoxetine is an important determinant of its potency and its specificity as a serotonin-uptake inhibitor, e.g. the analogue having an o-trifluoromethyl substituent on that ring is only about one-hundredth as potent as fluoxetine in inhibiting serotonin uptake (Wonget al, 1975a). Nisoxetine (Wonget al, 1975b) and tomoxetine (Wonget al, 1982) are analogues differing from fluoxetine only in having ano-methoxy or ano-methyl substituent respectively, in place of thep-trifluoromethyl substituent on the phenoxy ring. Nisoxetine (LY94939) and tomoxetine (LY 139603) are potent and highly selective inhibitors of norepinephrine uptake (Wonget al, 1975b, 1982), differing strikingly from fluoxetine in specificity of uptake inhibition. Fluoxetine has been shown to be a potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake in laboratory animals; it is orally effective and has a long duration of action. This compound has been a valuable pharmacological tool to study the mechanisms of serotonergic neurotransmission and physiological functions of brain serotonin neurons (Fuller & Wong, 1977; Wonget al, 1985a; Fuller & Wong, 1987). The present paper summarises some of the pre-clinical studies which have characterised fluoxetine as a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: