Qualitative study uncovers spatial and emotional dimensions of security among undocumented individuals, highlighting the methodological value of participatory mental mapping.
This article examines the merits and limitations of mental mapping for studying everyday (in)securities. Drawing on research with unauthorized people in the Brussels Capital Region, the article shows how mental mapping redirects attention from spectacular narratives of danger towards mundane practices of security and generates nuanced data on the spatial, temporal and emotional dimensions of everyday (in)securities. The findings demonstrate that mental mapping can capture the lived, affective and relational textures of (in)security, thereby contributing to methodological and empirical debates on how insecurity is experienced, negotiated and made sense of in everyday contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liekens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: