Key result
Coronary intravascular lithotripsy demonstrated non-inferior freedom from 30-day MACE (93.8% vs. 91.2%, P=0.008) and procedural success (93.8% vs. 91.6%, P=0.007) compared to a historical control in Japanese patients with severely calcified lesions.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intravascular lithotripsy for de novo, severely calcified coronary artery stenoses in a Japanese population.
Does intravascular lithotripsy improve procedural success and safety in Japanese patients with severely calcified coronary arteries prior to stent placement?
Does intravascular lithotripsy improve procedural success and safety in Japanese patients with severely calcified coronary arteries prior to stent placement?
Effect estimate: Difference 2.53% (95% CI -3.79)
Absolute Event Rate: 93.8% vs 91.2%
p-value: p=0.008
Coronary intravascular lithotripsy is safe and effective for vessel preparation in severely calcified lesions in a Japanese population, with outcomes non-inferior to Western cohorts.
Supports IVL feasibility in Japanese calcified lesions; extends Western data yet leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) delivers acoustic pressure waves to modify calcium, enhance vessel compliance and optimize stent deployment. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of IVL treatment of de novo stenoses involving severely calcified coronary vessels in a Japanese population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Disrupt CAD IV (NCT04151628) was a prospective, multicenter study designed for Japanese regulatory approval of coronary IVL (SWM-1234). The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. The primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success (residual stenosis <50% by QCA without in-hospital MACE). Noninferiority analyses for the primary endpoints were performed by comparing the CAD IV cohort with a propensity-matched historical IVL control group. Patients (intent-to-treat, n=64) were enrolled from 8 centers in Japan. Severe calcification by core laboratory assessment was present in all lesions, with a calcified length of 49.8±15.5 mm and a calcium angle of 257.9±78.4° by optical coherence tomography. Primary endpoints were achieved with non-inferiority demonstrated for freedom from 30-day MACE (CAD IV: 93.8% vs. Control: 91.2%, P=0.008), and procedural success (CAD IV: 93.8% vs. Control: 91.6%, P=0.007). No perforations, abrupt closures, or slow/no-reflow events occurred at any time during the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary IVL demonstrated high procedural success with low MACE rates in severely calcified lesions in a Japanese population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2021) studied Severely calcified coronary artery lesions (n=64). Intravascular lithotripsy vs. Propensity-matched historical IVL control group was evaluated on Freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days (Difference 2.53%, 95% CI -3.79, p=0.008). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy demonstrated non-inferior freedom from 30-day MACE (93.8% vs. 91.2%, P=0.008) and procedural success (93.8% vs. 91.6%, P=0.007) compared to a historical control in Japanese patients with severely calcified lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: