Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) was dried using a tray dryer, recirculating tray dryer, and vacuum dryer at 35 °C, 40 °C, and 45 °C, respectively. The dried thyme after attaining 5% moisture content was subjected to a grinding process to obtain powder using a hammer mill for further analysis of physiochemical properties, bioactive compounds, and techno-functional properties. The ash content was 10.21%, fiber content was 13.57%, fat content was 1.69%, protein content was 5.61%, and carbohydrate content was 22.91% for the thyme sample dried at 35 °C via vacuum drying. Meanwhile, regarding the functional properties, the swelling power was 0.31%, dispersibility was 27.72%, emulsion capacity was 35.44%, foam capacity was 35.47%, and foam stability was 1.84% for the thyme sample dried at 40 °C in the vacuum dryer. The total chlorophyll content, ascorbic acid content, and bioactive compounds were retained best in the vacuum-dried sample at 40 °C. Bioactive compound retention for VDT among the selected three techniques at 35 °C was considerably better. The color values were found to be similar to those of freshly harvested thyme (hue, 93.39; chroma, 3.47) for the thyme sample dried at 40 °C in a vacuum dryer. Based on the analysis, it was found that vacuum drying at 40 °C gave better results, followed by the recirculating tray dryer at 40 °C and the tray dryer at 40 °C. The adequately dried thyme samples with the time–temperature combinations for different drying techniques used can be used further for product development and studies on their shelf life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: