Key result
Atrial fibrillation was associated with a significantly higher self-reported treatment burden compared to non-AF controls (27.6% vs. 24.3%, P=0.011).
Why the study?
Treatment burden had been documented in several chronic conditions using validated tools, but had not yet been assessed in atrial fibrillation.
Does atrial fibrillation and its specific treatments (VKA vs NOAC) increase self-reported treatment burden compared to non-AF controls?
Observational (n=514)
No
Does atrial fibrillation and its specific treatments (VKA vs NOAC) increase self-reported treatment burden compared to non-AF controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 27.6% vs 24.3%
p-value: p=0.011
Atrial fibrillation patients experience a significantly higher treatment burden than non-AF controls, which is further exacerbated by VKA use compared to NOACs and independently predicts decreased quality of life.
Higher treatment burden associated with AF and VKAs warrants attention in shared decisions; observational data leaves open causality and intervention effects.
AIMS: Treatment burden (TB) refers to self-perceived cumulative work patients do to manage their health. Using validated tools, TB has been documented in several chronic conditions, but not atrial fibrillation (AF). We measured TB and analysed its determinants and impact on quality of life (QoL) in an AF cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-centre study prospectively included consecutive adult AF patients and non-AF controls managed from 1 April to 21 June 2019, who voluntarily and anonymously answered the TB questionnaire (TBQ) and 5-item EQ-5D QoL questionnaire; TB was calculated as a sum of TBQ points (maximum 170) and expressed as proportion of the maximum value. Of 514 participants, 331 (64.4%) had AF. The mean self-reported TB was 27.6% among AF patients and 24.3% among controls, P = 0.011. The mean TB was significantly higher in patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) vs. those taking non-VKA antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC; 29.5% vs. 24.7%, P = 0.006). The highest item-specific TB was reported for healthcare system organization-related items (e.g. visit appointment), diet, and physical activity modifications. On multivariable analyses, female sex, younger age, and permanent AF were associated with a higher TB, whereas NOACs and electrical AF cardioversion exhibited an inverse association; TB was an independent predictor of decreased QoL (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study provided clinically relevant insights into self-perceived TB among AF patients. Approximately one in four patients with AF have a high TB. Specific AF treatments and optimization of healthcare system-required patient activities may reduce the self-perceived TB in AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potpara et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=514). Atrial fibrillation vs. Non-AF controls was evaluated on Self-reported treatment burden (proportion of maximum TBQ points) (p=0.011). Atrial fibrillation was associated with a significantly higher self-reported treatment burden compared to non-AF controls (27.6% vs. 24.3%, P=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: