Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between single-channel and banded neural response imaging (NRI) responses and to evaluate whether banded NRI measurements are better correlated to fitting parameters than single-channel NRI measurements. PATIENTS: Nineteen profoundly deaf subjects implanted with a HiRes 90K cochlear implant from Advanced Bionics Corporation (Valencia, CA). INTERVENTION(S): Neural response imaging thresholds (tNRIs; single-channel and banded tNRIs) were measured intraoperatively; at first fitting; and after 3, 6, and 12 months of implant use. Relationships between those measurements and correlations between those measurements and implant program parameters were investigated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Single-channel and banded tNRI collected at each measurement session. RESULTS: Banded NRI could be recorded reliably and was not more time-consuming than the routine single-channel NRI. Significant correlations (Pearson R; p < 0.05) were observed between first-fitting banded tNRI and most comfortable levels at 12 months, with a higher level of significance than the correlations observed with single-channel tNRI. CONCLUSION: Banded NRI may be a more appropriate fitting tool than single-channel NRI. However, the sample size was small, and more data are necessary to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akın et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: