Key result
Having no one to confide in was associated with poorer psychological and overall well-being, with approximately 20% of prostate cancer patients lacking emotional support.
Cross-Sectional (n=866)
A significant proportion of prostate cancer patients lack emotional support, which negatively impacts their well-being, highlighting the need for gender-adapted psychosocial support.
May prompt assessment of emotional support in prostate cancer; leaves open whether interventions improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate to what extent prostate cancer patients confide their emotional concerns, and whether having no one to confide in affects well-being. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based study using epidemiological methods. A questionnaire was mailed to all 431 living prostate cancer patients aged 50-80 at the time of selection, diagnosed 1.5-2 years previously in Stockholm County, and 435 randomly selected men in the same age group. The questionnaire was completed anonymously. The main outcome measures included questions assessing the extent to which the men could share emotionally taxing feelings with their partner or others and questions assessing well-being. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 79% of the patients and by 73% of the randomly selected men. Approximately one in five patients had no one to confide in. Of patients living with a partner, only one in 10 confided in someone other than their partner. Three out of 10 patients living in a relationship could not confide in their partner. Men having no one to confide in were less content with their life and reported poorer psychological and overall well-being compared with other men. The prostate cancer patients were not more likely to have someone to confide in than men in general. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a lack of emotional support may be a problem for many prostate cancer patients and that the traditional psychosocial support offered to most cancer patients in Sweden may not reach male patients. There may be a need for a gender-adapted approach to emotional support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul W. Dickman Ásgeir R. Helgason (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Prostate cancer (n=866). Emotional isolation (having no one to confide in) vs. Having someone to confide in was evaluated on Well-being and extent of sharing emotionally taxing feelings. Having no one to confide in was associated with poorer psychological and overall well-being, with approximately 20% of prostate cancer patients lacking emotional support.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: