Key result
Rapid progression of mild aortic stenosis was associated with a lower 7-year cardiac event-free survival rate compared to slow progression (87.5% vs. 100%).
Cohort (n=103)
In patients with mild aortic stenosis, echocardiographic progression is generally slow but highly variable, with rapid progression predicted by age, baseline AV Vmax, and AV calcification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May identify higher-risk mild AS patients for closer monitoring; leaves open whether progression-based strategies improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The factors related to the progression of mild aortic stenosis (AS) remain unknown. We wanted to evaluate the long-term outcomes and predictors of echocardiographic progression in patients with mild AS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 103 consecutive asymptomatic patients (62.1±11.9 years, 31 males) with mild AS. Mild AS was defined as aortic valve (AV) thickening accompanied by a peak aortic jet velocity (AV Vmax) ≥2.0 and <3.0 m/sec, and rapid progression of AS was defined as an average annual increase in the AV Vmax ≥0.2 m/sec, and cardiac events were defined as cardiac death or AV replacement. RESULTS: During a median echocardiographic follow-up time of 6.0 years, the average change in the AV Vmax was 0.08±0.10 m/sec per year. The rate of progression was significantly associated with age, moderate-to-severe AV calcification and the baseline AV Vmax, but not with the serum cholesterol level. The baseline AV Vmax (2.6±0.3 m/sec vs. 2.2±0.3 m/sec, respectively, p<0.001) and the incidence of moderate-to-severe AV calcification (92.9% vs. 36.5%, respectively, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the rapid progression group than in the slow progression group. The 7-year cardiac event-free survival rate was lower in the rapid progression group than in the slow pro-gression group (87.5±8.3% vs. 100%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The progression of AS was slower than expected and it was related to age, the baseline AV Vmax and AV calcification. Because of the marked individual variability in progression, the patients showing rapid progression of AS need closer follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Mild aortic stenosis (n=103). Rapid progression of aortic stenosis (annual increase in AV Vmax ≥0.2 m/sec) vs. Slow progression of aortic stenosis was evaluated on 7-year cardiac event-free survival (cardiac death or AV replacement). Rapid progression of mild aortic stenosis was associated with a lower 7-year cardiac event-free survival rate compared to slow progression (87.5% vs. 100%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: