Key result
A small brain injury and shock significantly increased bihemispheric pial arteriolar diameter compared to large lesions and controls, while a large injury decreased it in the injured hemisphere.
Why the study?
Does lesion volume affect cerebral vasomotor tone and reactivity after focal brain injury and shock in swine?
RCT
randomized
Does lesion volume affect cerebral vasomotor tone and reactivity after focal brain injury and shock in swine?
The volume of injured brain tissue influences cerebral blood flow via vascular mechanisms, potentially due to altered cerebral endothelial cell function.
Lesion volume may differentially affect cerebral vasomotor tone after brain injury with shock; hypothesis-generating in swine and leaves open human translation.
We have previously shown that the volume of a focal brain injury influences cerebral blood flow. We hypothesized that the cerebral vasomotor tone after traumatic brain injury and shock is related to lesion volume and that the size of the lesion would affect vasomotor reactivity. Swine were randomized to receive either a large or small cryogenic injury followed by shock, and were studied for 5 h postresuscitation. A small brain injury and shock produced a significant and sustained increase in bihemispheric pial arteriolar diameter when compared to the large lesion group and controls. A large brain injury and shock resulted in a significant decrease in the pial arteriolar diameter in the injured hemisphere. We also noted significant differences between and within groups in interhemispheric pial arteriolar diameter and pial arteriolar reactivity to acetylcholine and hypocarbia. These data suggest that the volume of injured tissue influences cerebral blood flow by a vascular mechanism, which may be due in part to an alteration in cerebral endothelial cell function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmoker et al. (1996) conducted an RCT in traumatic brain injury and shock. Large or small cryogenic injury followed by shock vs. Controls was evaluated on pial arteriolar diameter and reactivity. A small brain injury and shock significantly increased bihemispheric pial arteriolar diameter compared to large lesions and controls, while a large injury decreased it in the injured hemisphere.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: