Key result
Isometric hip rotation forces measured by hand-held dynamometry demonstrated high consistency over time (ICC 0.836-0.944) and between sides (ICC 0.897-0.901), unlike force ratios.
Observational (n=47)
Isometric force measurements of hip rotation obtained during a previous test session or from the other side provide a reliable basis for measurement interpretation, unlike force ratios.
Supports consistent hip rotation force interpretation from prior or contralateral measures; hypothesis-generating for force ratios pending validation.
Little research has focused on the measurement of both hip external and internal rotation strength. The purpose of this study was to describe the consistency of isometric hip rotation forces measured by hand-held dyanamometry. Specifically, we described the consistency over time and between sides. For 15 subjects measured during 2 sessions one week apart, rotation forces and force ratios did not differ significantly. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high (0.836–0.944) except for the external to internal rotation force ratio on the right side (0.367). For 32 subjects measured during 1 session, hip external rotation forces and rotation force ratios did, but hip internal rotation forces did not, differ between sides. The between-side ICCs were high for the force measures (0.897&0.901) but not for the force ratio (0.337). Unlike force ratios, isometric force measurements obtained during a previous test session or from the other side provide a basis for measurement interpretation. The method errors and coefficients of variation of the method error that we report may be helpful in such interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohannon et al. (2008) reported an observational. Hand-held dynamometry vs. Previous test session or contralateral side was evaluated on Consistency of isometric hip rotation forces over time and between sides. Isometric hip rotation forces measured by hand-held dynamometry demonstrated high consistency over time (ICC 0.836-0.944) and between sides (ICC 0.897-0.901), unlike force ratios.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: