Key result
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with normal myocardial contractility compared to normal subjects, with similar ESPVR slopes (3.1 vs 2.6 mmHg/ml, ns).
Why the study?
Is myocardial contractility altered in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to normal subjects when assessed by end-systolic pressure-volume relations?
Observational (n=18)
Is myocardial contractility altered in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to normal subjects when assessed by end-systolic pressure-volume relations?
Myocardial contractility at both chamber and muscle levels is normal, not supernormal, in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy despite increased muscle mass.
Challenges notion of supernormal contractility in HCM; leaves open validation of ESPVR in larger prospective cohorts.
To evaluate myocardial contractility in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC), we obtained the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (ESPVR) and the end-systolic stress-volume relation (ESSVR) by changing loading conditions with Angiotensin II. The left ventricular (LV) stress-shortening relation was also analyzed in order to assess myocardial contractility. LV end-systolic pressure, end-systolic volume, end-systolic stress, and ejection fraction were obtained at rest and during Angiotensin II infusion with simultaneous recordings of pressure and volume in 9 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 9 normal subjects (N). The slopes of ESPVR, Emax, showed no significant difference (HC: 3.1 +/- 2.3 vs N: 2.6 +/- 1.4 mmHg/ml, ns). The slopes of ESSVR were statistically similar (HC: 5.2 +/- 2.1 vs N: 6.0 +/- 2.8 g/cm2 ml, ns). The slopes of end-systolic stress-ejection fraction relation were also in the same range in both groups (HC: -0.09 +/- 0.05 vs N: -0.10 +/- 0.05, ns). From these two different analyses of LV contractility, we conclude that myocardial contractility is normal in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and not supernormal, at both chamber and muscle levels. Considering the increased muscle mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC: 134 +/- 46 vs N: 74 +/- 19 g/m2, p less than 0.01), the presence of increased numbers of contractile units does not result in enhanced overall chamber contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (1987) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=18). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Slopes of end-systolic pressure-volume relation (ESPVR, Emax) (p=ns). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with normal myocardial contractility compared to normal subjects, with similar ESPVR slopes (3.1 vs 2.6 mmHg/ml, ns).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: