Key result
The dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA) demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.6% and specificity of 98.0% for detecting EV71 antigen, showing no significant difference compared to DIGFA.
Why the study?
Does a dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA) accurately detect enterovirus 71 antigen compared to a dot-immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA) in patients with hand, foot and mouth disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=126)
Does a dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA) accurately detect enterovirus 71 antigen compared to a dot-immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA) in patients with hand, foot and mouth disease?
The dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA) is a rapid, sensitive, and specific screening technique for detecting EV71 antigen in patients with hand, foot and mouth disease, performing comparably to DIGFA.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a rapid, sensitive dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay to detect enterovirus 71 (EV71) antigen in serum samples from paediatric patients with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), through detection of anti-EV71 immunoglobulin (Ig)M. METHODS: Serum samples from HFMD patients and healthy adult controls were evaluated for the presence of anti-EV71 IgM using a dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA). The results were compared with those obtained using a dot-immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA). The EV71 structural protein VP1 was used as the antigen for both assays. RESULTS: Serum samples from 72 HFMD patients and 54 healthy controls were evaluated. The DIGFA procedure showed a sensitivity of 98.5% and a specificity of 100%, whereas the DIEFA procedure showed a sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 98.0%. There were no significant differences between the assays in either specificity or sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The DIEFA procedure developed in this study has potential as a rapid, simple, sensitive and cost-effective screening technique for detecting EV71 antigen in serum samples from patients with HFMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) (n=126). Dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA) vs. Dot-immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for detecting anti-EV71 IgM (p=ns). The dot-immunoenzyme filtration assay (DIEFA) demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.6% and specificity of 98.0% for detecting EV71 antigen, showing no significant difference compared to DIGFA.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: