Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper discusses the responsibilities, objectives, and effectiveness requirements in civil aviation regulation, and forms an effective theoretical structure for regulatory auditing by building an organic link between responsibility auditing, performance evaluation and management cycle improvement. First, responsibility auditing ensures that all parties have clear responsibilities and improves transparency and accountability. Secondly, performance evaluation monitors and evaluates the effectiveness of civil aviation regulation by setting clear objectives and indicators to ensure that objectives are met and to promote continuous improvement. In addition, management cycle enhancement is a systematic process involving planning, implementation, inspection, and improvement. By introducing audit and evaluation mechanisms at each stage, problems can be effectively identified and adjusted, creating dynamic feedback to ensure the effectiveness and timeliness of regulatory measures. This theoretical framework provides new perspectives and methods for improving current civil aviation regulatory practices, and has important theoretical and practical significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: