Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report a detailed analytical, numerical, and experimental study of microdisk resonators doped with nanometer sized silicon quantum dots (nanocrystals). An intuitive analytical ray-optics-based model is developed and used to capture the behavior of the quality factor $(Q)$ as a function of the disk size and the attenuation coefficient. Two regimes in the behavior of Q with the disk size establish a simple design rule for optimizing the performance of these cavities. The validity of our analytical model is verified by full-vectorial finite element method calculations of the microcavity modes. Based on the predictions of the analytical and numerical calculations, we have fabricated microdisk resonators with diameters ranging between 2 and 80.3em0exμm. Q>10³ are obtained for disk radii as small as 40.3em0exμm---highest observed for Si-nanocrystal-doped microdisk resonators. The fundamental limit on Q is estimated by quantifying all of the potential optical loss processes through a careful analysis which includes the effects of nanocrystal size distribution. Our theoretical calculations match well with experiments and reveal that the line-edge roughness scattering and radiation loss can be minimized sufficiently to enable study and quantification of more fundamental optical loss processes of this material due to band-to-band absorption, Mie scattering, and free-carrier absorption in the Si nanocrystals. Using the experimental Q's and the mode volumes, we predict the maximum low-temperature Purcell enhancement factor in our structures on the order of 6 and with some design improvements enhancements up to 50 can be realized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kekatpure et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: