This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Six new Cu(I) complexes with pincer N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands of the type 2,6-bis(3-alkylimidazol-2-ylidene)pyridine, I(R) CNC, and 2,6-bis(3-alkylimidazol-2-ylidene)methylpyridine, I(R) C^N^C, where R = Me, Et, and i Pr have been synthesized using Cu precursors and bis(imidazolium) salts. All of these compounds, namely, [Cu 2 (IMe CNC ) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2, 1; [Cu 2 (IEt CNC ) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2, 2; [Cu 2 (I i Pr CNC ) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2, 3; [Cu(IMe C^N^C )](PF 6 ), 4; [Cu(IEt C^N^C )](PF 6 ), 5; and [Cu(I i Pr C^N^C )](PF 6 ), 6, have been characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopies, elemental analysis, solution conductivity, and electrochemical studies. Single crystal X-ray structures were obtained for all complexes except 1 . The crystallographic data reveal a binuclear structure containing two Cu atoms at a close distance, 2.622–2.811 Å for all the complexes except 5, which shows a unique mononuclear structure. Spatial syn arrangement of ethyl groups and extensive π–π stacking in the solid state accounts for the mononuclear structure of complex 5 . A pseudolinear coordination geometry about metal centers consisting of two Cu–carbene bonds, as well as weak Cu–pyridine interactions, exist among all the complexes independent of their ligand. Solution-state conductivity data reveal a dominant 1:2 electrolyte behavior for 1 – 3 but 1:1 electrolyte for 4 – 6, consistent with the sustainable binuclear structure in solutions of Cu(I)–I(R) CNC complexes. Cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry studies reveal an irreversible and two quasi-reversible peaks for the one-electron oxidation of solvent-bound and solvent-free binuclear and mononuclear Cu-NHC species in complexes 1 – 3 . In contrast, the reversible Cu(II)/Cu(I) couples of 4 – 6 at potentials close to that of complexes with tripodal polydentate NHC scaffolds indicate the electronic and structural flexibility of I(R) C^N^C ligands to accommodate both Cu(I) and Cu(II) ions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domyati et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: