Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 9, 2003Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

In vivo comparison of the osseointegration of vacuum plasma sprayed titanium‐ and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

NANikolaus AebliGriffith UniversityJKJörg KrebsUniversity of LucerneHSH. StichUniversity of Bern

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Aebli et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9cc642ccf76bb89d97a54chttps://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10508
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs1991 · 1,721 citations
  2. 2In vivo tensile testing of fluorapatite and hydroxylapatite plasma‐sprayed coatings1994 · 106 citations
  3. 3Direct electron microscopy studies of the bone—hydroxylapatite interface1984 · 259 citations
  4. 4Radiostereometry of Hip Prostheses1997 · 333 citations
  5. 5Hydroxyapatite-Coated Titanium for Orthopedic Implant Applications1988 · 367 citations