Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Specific p53 mutations abrogate tumor-suppressive functions by gaining new abilities to promote tumorigenesis. Inactivation of p53 is known to distort TGF-β signaling, which paradoxically displays both tumor-suppressive and pro-oncogenic functions. The molecular mechanisms of how mutant p53 simultaneously antagonizes the tumor-suppressive and synergizes the tumor-promoting function of the TGF-β pathway remain elusive. Here we demonstrate that mutant p53 differentially regulates subsets of TGF-β target genes by enhanced binding to the MH2 domain in Smad3 upon the integration of ERK signaling, therefore disrupting Smad3/Smad4 complex formation. Silencing Smad2, inhibition of ERK, or introducing a phosphorylation-defective mutation at Ser-392 in p53 abrogates the R175H mutant p53-dependent regulation of these TGF-β target genes. Our study shows a mechanism to reconcile the seemingly contradictory observations that mutant p53 can both attenuate and cooperate with the TGF-β pathway to promote cancer cell malignancy in the same cell type. Background: The molecular mechanisms by which mutant p53 deregulates the TGF-β pathway remain obscure. Results: Mutant p53 disrupts the Smad3/Smad4 complex by occupying the MH2 domain in Smad3 upon ERK activation. Conclusion: Mutant p53 achieves gain of function by attenuating and cooperating with the TGF-β pathway via targeting Smad3. Significance: We discovered a new mechanistic mode explaining the cross-talks among the mutant p53, TGF-β, and ERK pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: