Key result
Trait anxiety was associated with increased task-irrelevant processing only in the supraliminal condition, whereas group effects were eliminated when primes were masked.
Observational
Differences in selective attention and cognitive control associated with trait anxiety solely modulate conscious distractor processing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports anxiety effects on attention limited to conscious processing; hypothesis-generating and should not yet inform clinical assessment or models.
Trait anxiety has long been associated with impaired selective attention to task-irrelevant threat stimuli, both when threat is presented consciously and outside of awareness. However recent research has suggested broader deficits in selective attention, with poorer ability to ignore supraliminal non-emotional information in anxiety. Here, we investigated whether anxiety could equally be associated with poorer selective attention for non-emotional stimuli in a subliminal context. Participants performed a simple arrow discrimination task, where prior incompatible or compatible response primes were presented before targets either unmasked (supraliminal) or masked (subliminal). While distractor interference was evident in both conditions, trait anxiety was associated with increased task-irrelevant processing only in the supraliminal condition; group effects were eliminated when primes were masked. Our findings are in line with traditional accounts suggesting that differences in selective attention and cognitive control solely modulate conscious distractor processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berggren et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Trait anxiety. Trait anxiety was evaluated on Task-irrelevant processing (distractor interference) during an arrow discrimination task. Trait anxiety was associated with increased task-irrelevant processing only in the supraliminal condition, whereas group effects were eliminated when primes were masked.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: