Key result
Coronary microvascular disease was associated with better survival than significant epicardial CAD, but worse all-cause mortality than an age- and gender-matched population control (p < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Does coronary microvascular disease affect long-term survival compared to significant epicardial CAD and matched population controls in patients with chest pain and positive stress tests?
Cohort (n=935)
Does coronary microvascular disease affect long-term survival compared to significant epicardial CAD and matched population controls in patients with chest pain and positive stress tests?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Coronary microvascular disease is associated with worse long-term survival compared to the general population, highlighting it as a prognostically significant condition rather than a benign finding.
The syndrome of chest pain, abnormal stress test, and nonflow limiting coronary artery disease (CAD) is common and is attributed to coronary microvascular disease (µVD). It is associated with increased hospital admissions and health care costs. But its impact on long-term survival is not known. Of the 9941 consecutive patients who had an exercise stress test for evaluation of chest pain between May 1991 and July 2007, 935 had both a positive stress test and a coronary angiogram within 1 year of their stress test forming the study cohort. Significant angiographic CAD defined as ≥70% stenosis of an epicardial coronary artery or ≥50% stenosis of the left main coronary artery was present in 324 patients. Rest (n = 611) were considered to have coronary µVD. Compared with patients with significant epicardial CAD, patients with coronary µVD were younger (63 ± 11 vs. 65 ± 10 years, p = 0.002), and had lower left ventricular wall thickness (p < 0.02), systolic blood pressure (BP; p = 0.002), pulse pressure (0.0008), systolic BP with exercise (p = 0.0001), and pulse pressure with exercise (p < 0.0001). Those with coronary µVD had a better survival compared with those with significant epicardial CAD, but worse than that expected for age- and gender-matched population (p < 0.0001). Coronary µVD as a cause of chest pain and positive stress test is common. All-cause mortality in patients with coronary µVD is worse than in an age- and gender-matched population control, but better than those with significant epicardial CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Chest pain with positive stress test (n=935). Coronary microvascular disease vs. Significant epicardial CAD and age- and gender-matched population was evaluated on Long-term survival / all-cause mortality (p=<0.0001). Coronary microvascular disease was associated with better survival than significant epicardial CAD, but worse all-cause mortality than an age- and gender-matched population control (p < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: