Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the PM&R ethical legal column, Is an appropriate wheelchair becoming out of reach? 1, we introduced the evolving difficulties of getting high-quality, liberating wheelchairs to patients. To recap the issue: “Never before has the world been more replete with technological aids for people with disabilities: high-performing prosthetics; accessible computer devices; environmental control units; wheelchairs that can recline, stand, and climb curbs; and laptop-sized ventilators to name just a few devices. Such tools can make the difference between people with physical disabilities living in their own homes, participating in their communities, and being engaged in the workforce versus being confined to an institution or an inaccessible home and even to bed. Yet, just as Tantalus in Homer's Odyssey stood immersed chest high in water beneath a tree laden with ripe fruit, he could neither quench his hunger nor thirst. As he would reach up to grasp or bend down to drink, the fruit and water would move just out of reach. So it is for many people with disabilities when they gaze at all the available technologies. Tantalizing, but unattainable. Nowhere is the situation more frustrating than in the domain of wheelchairs. Access to liberating mobility equipment is changing—and often not for the good” In Part I, Jessica Pedersen emphasized the importance of having knowledgeable seating and positioning specialists involved in all stages of the procurement process. Ideally, a certified ATP and a seating and mobility specialist would be involved, and the manufacturer would work only with qualified suppliers who can support the end users. She noted that best practice seating and positioning clinics are closing due to the low reimbursement rates for the evaluation time of the therapist and high administrative burden from documentation requirements. In addition to recommending that insurers require and adequately reimburse for evaluations with seating specialists, she recommends streamlining the administrative paperwork, including utilization of electronic forms and signatures. Other potential solutions include exploring recycling equipment in good condition and advocating for policy changes that would enhance access to wheelchairs for those who need them to participate in the community. In her commentary, Denise Harmon underscored the importance of maintaining best practice wheelchair evaluations and emphasized the need to value not only the seating and technology specialists but also the centrality of the consumer-user's perspective and preferences. Denise Harmon lays out the innumerable challenges that complex rehabilitation companies face in attempting to meet the consumer's needs while complying with numerous disparate rules and regulation of the payers. Both Jessica Pedersen and Denise Harmon urge support of the pending legislation HR 492/S.948 “Ensuring Access to Quality Complex Rehabilitation Technology Act” 2 as a step in the right direction. As always, I welcome your comments to this column or suggestions for future columns! It was an average day for Henry Williams, a middle-aged African American man who has been living for nearly 5 years with a mobility disability due to amputation of his left leg. While crossing the busy intersection of Clark and Chicago, his power scooter suddenly died in the middle of the street, and Williams was forced to ask strangers to push him to the sidewalk away from oncoming traffic. Before that incident, Williams considered the quality of his scooter to be “pretty good, but somewhat cheap.” The cheap quality of his scooter was confirmed in his mind the day that the battery on his scooter died in the middle of a congested intersection. Williams has been using DME for as long as he has been disabled and is dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. He relies on his scooter as his main form of transportation for activities of daily living at home and for community participation. Throughout Williams's years of using DME, the quality of his equipment has been problematic. For instance, the battery on his scooter dies quickly, and he must be cautious that he is in places with accessible outlets for recharging. On stormy days, a wet steering tiller on the scooter impairs its function. Perhaps the most frustrating thing for Williams is his inability to get his DME provider to come to his home with replacement batteries even after offering to pay for them with out-of-pocket cash. In a recent survey of 13 people with disabilities who use power scooters and wheelchairs, and who pay for their DME with a mix of private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and out-of-pocket funds, the Access Living Health Team found that Williams's experience mirrored the unreliability and poor quality of DME reported by the other survey respondents. Similarly, the problems that Williams has faced in getting simple maintenance and replacement batteries for his scooter are typical of the challenges faced by the other survey participants and likely countless others nationwide. It is important to note that all those interviewed are connected in some way with the independent living movement. As disability advocates, they are knowledgeable about their disabilities, their equipment, their DME suppliers, their insurance, and their medical providers. Yet, even these savvy consumers have difficulty navigating the world of DME, and report trouble in finding customer service–oriented suppliers. Some consumers even described the process of managing the time-consuming and cumbersome authorizations processes as a “nightmare.” The result is that they are forced to use poor-quality equipment that frequently requires simple repairs, such as the replacement of a defective arm rest, tire, or battery, that render the equipment unsafe or unusable. For Carol Gill, PhD, a professor at the University of Illinois, and a subscriber of private insurance, these obstacles sometimes cost her work days because she has no way of transporting herself. “It's absurd to require a doctor's prescription just to a or a for more for the and to get because the has to the the process. when all authorizations and replacement are is the of finding the who is to come to home to the or many suppliers out of wheelchair have no to get needs are the process of and an for these because the equipment often is in and for their and can or medical For that she a and to her but the she was in and from her the she was to use that that all noted was the of who are and knowledgeable about a in the between consumers and their as more consumers have that with equipment and can be to getting have that from with wheelchair must a who not the of the As quality of provider and equipment has more to with the the has with have a with your are more likely to quality and important finding of survey was of the consumer's or the problems the that equipment, repairs, and poor customer finding about the problems with procurement and maintenance of quality DME are due to reimbursement or other for for the quality of DME, consumers the need to the process for and simple repairs, and that from be for and replacement of such as or also that suppliers need to in a of and to the process and the consumer's and a power wheelchair who also is a subscriber of private and on the of the University of Illinois, that be considered a just are for by the as a be after we are forced to in at for more not to was on a the Health Team at Access Living that it the of problems that the and of wheelchair and scooter the it also all the consumers knowledgeable about their disabilities and the of their DME and to for their DME and medical the of to those who are not knowledgeable many are forced homes, or because of their of access to power mobility As the need for appropriate and DME we to people and Health and need to grasp the of these and with the disability community to I of the challenges in the DME as an at As a I was the to of the in a to that the DME such as the and to and by using a are to of and I the to this to a for the of DME for with complex after to and the I have As I complex and the of the of the and of in the of technological in and the in the and with the and the I The of this of was often a of and this of a few of the DME as The it for to the process. when with the many participants to on and the of that the of to a on the process for a power wheelchair or a of complex rehabilitation equipment is in this it is in this to the of DME use suppliers who equipment to the end suppliers often who support the or physical therapist when and a The and therapist are for that the equipment is they on the by the to their The often with and companies or Medicare to the and of the the equipment is and the of the equipment and is for In the of a or the must to for include be in the equipment or the of the a qualified is the for and reimbursement are this an equipment for equipment due to a of qualified and equipment is often 5 years or the time of the the equipment as a or of it or in a The process that a must when not only of but also of other in the the of equipment, maintenance and quality are to that as value as the DME For instance, a to have an to a power wheelchair that it was to support maintenance nor an in or when the was no is mind The that the the importance of companies or equipment as as the of for complex rehabilitation equipment and a to his or her but this not the of a be a in a could for the of a would activities as a to and payers. include and equipment, maintaining an of and repairs, and The could be for or to the of available to who are for or with and access to a for high quality the could a to of his or her with the that an appropriate and maintenance and be available to the at all activities also be to the of such as Medicare and private It could the to the that a the right to and insurers can more their to the when I to work with DME to to a and to this was a In its a for an is a of the of and its and and with and the of the be with that them to are for and we could for by with for the of is often as a simple with the in the and cost in the For a we and of It that the we not The that to the of the to the average of days in a and the average of days in a in a I was to such as using as wheelchairs while or the of I was by the between the that available and those that reported their quality of of also Health in the to on a and are often by reimbursement In the cost of a of could the appropriate and the reimbursement As an the of a is on the for to the and the reimbursement in the of is a cost these in are they are it cost the manufacturer to this of The cost to and the equipment an appropriate to the the cost of a of equipment the cost to or the in the of its the of repairs, and and replacement the of the equipment, a not considered in I the of and as in the In many is being these DME and are not those The of the and the of cost make a to The of that needs to the needs of the and the and not the for being for The cost as in also is an for a of equipment that is to many years and requires and must include a of all to the of the is the to make that and be an appropriate procurement policy for such as medical it is in the of than an of DME as a of a physical good, it be considered an in a mobility for a being in DME for with complex rehabilitation from its support that for and in DME its I sometimes I have in 2 the of and the of As an therapist and a I have in the of providers. I in technology that can enhance such as computer and electronic aids to daily living include such as and I have and about such and aids for a of people with complex including and and computer access can be liberating for those with more complex physical The to to the world with some of after control of can to a of and The that technology is available to make it as as The from the some technology is not in the of computer and not a for Medicaid, Medicare, and most private a in in the is more of a for and as as than to that on such technology only and are and for most are or for those with complex the technology can be for for the more but not a a it could that it is not to or to a The to is becoming more because many and to your to ask or to get about your medical for being to a on when are can to can have on and function. an can with and changes in away the to use a and we are away the to with or a doctor's with or having control of or to and to only the of the and often by the need for Such are to the of to enhance and to and quality of technology and has for inaccessible for those with I not about or but that can access to these with a simple or by at a computer Other such as those in most of a value on and it is available to those in of the in cost from to have been in American companies have to and these technologies. is I it is because the value and more for those living with I not that we move to the medical it would be to those with the disabilities to have the to access these technologies. other as a of the of was in as a with by using a wheelchair his the by companies not with and was because we and to for these To for it was that we or his was by the that him he could have a with a and a but a of getting support we more on the I not have the to this and not that we away from those an but I can we to and the challenges with the he I have more support after his than was available while he was move to the that of 5 years when I the and of was with a in in to condition of no of and and I require own and on the technology I with as a of providers. While I was to have good and have a power wheelchair with the to changes in function. I using a I with a and to to the of the I would have a of to and from I wheelchair by using a I can no use the changes for I would not be to and would be in a poor to and I I on Medicare and a wheelchair at this would be due to changes in Medicare The that a wheelchair be for is for for those with a those with a a wheelchair could have as as medical changes in procurement of an has as as for those most in are for those who a way to and them with a most to with complex can access to forms of electronic such as and I to need an at this time physical I would have the to between 2 with the electronic with a I to move to to of I be to use with others get support for or use a such as the I using to this the requires a high of As a of the of I have a of the and I have been to for I available in wheelchairs and have access to the I to when I was to it and technology to get I use of I would be the most and most with I not have the of a or because we those for I are available to I and it is to get and as I the of living with In addition to with the of and on I not only to and quality but also to a way to pay them a living For and for many who with disabilities, we the to be to to the I that has many of Quality and for such as and those that the and and other to name a are and quality of when it to for those with and we are I could be but I not that the on the of those in need I have a to the or technology access to those most in the than and often to and I at a as to all these I that private such as the and including the in Illinois, to step in and these at the end of the the is of of we to I a that regulation changes could the of with to those most at by than and having more of I a that to make the needs of those of with a complex medical condition a I have most of to the of The technology I have been to has the from a computer that was on to rehabilitation I by the these for the at the wheelchair the most important technology for to and is likely the most important prescription most other prescription can a who would be in to be independent in The wheelchair also is cost and is with other for a and wheelchair can by such as and the importance of the the way it is and by the is and for the The recent move is is being out in by Medicare, requires power and wheelchair to out for is that the process the of work that wheelchair are to as of an evaluation and of the and when a on wheelchairs, for the most is that or Is that wheelchairs, they are people are to use and they are could be is of In an survey 2 found that wheelchairs as the most technology by with and as the technology that most the who the wheelchair that he or she would be but they also its Is it to a that could on the a on a have the technology to all these a that is not on your average wheelchair users. the wheelchair even get the simple such as quality is of recent found that more than of wheelchair experience a of their that requires a is more than these and when are at we this we can make a more that of and we can a the reimbursement for quality are for cost not to for as to is and the to quality are about wheelchair to use their recent work has that wheelchair not have wheelchair the of wheelchair with in It is not that wheelchair are not being because the of in rehabilitation has It not be to the before is In is that people are to of using a even when they not have the to The to after a is it is that all the by and is of a that he or she not need the found when wheelchair are at to it has such as in more and more In the a of PM&R is the to on of to them to and to that we are the good The to the quality and of wheelchairs is a The Medicare is a by the The Medicare is a that Medicare not pay for all the or it only pay for or that are to be and for the Medicare of these that the Medicare is and in the The of the that DME a of a in the medical and wheelchairs include a that be as a wheelchair but only the use of such a is to be on the of the medical and physical condition and the such as the in the home an institution as his home other than an institution that the of of this or on a or The for this of the is to that the Medicare pay for some but not all wheelchairs the reported need of the equipment The for a other appropriate qualified as in the Medicare is to in the medical the for the wheelchair is The to the medical of the wheelchair is not to be to other providers. are the access for a Medicare In addition to medical the also must the prescription for the also are at the when wheelchair are To meet the for the medical of a the needs to and in the of his or her the and of wheelchairs and they to the and the Medicare for the wheelchair the a needs to documentation of the in of and or in or It would be considered to an of the and use of devices. the of wheelchair the needs to the and his or her of the of the power or The Medicare in of is as a for use of the of the or medical be from the medical the in the equipment or or the be by the with wheelchair can the to be to the wheelchair It not the wheelchair is a a a push or a power It is that the be with wheelchair for the to be to the Medicare The with a must be is the Medicare the of The and the it is not to that be an in the to for of DME, wheelchairs, power wheelchairs, and complex rehabilitation technology wheelchairs. The wheelchair is a wheelchair that requires and to for a wheelchair could be a or a power wheelchair that or or to the wheelchair to the the power wheelchair Medicare to the wheelchairs, but have been by and to a Medicare for The has that a DME can be for the DME of the are to the with a or to have the equipment as a a of that as by Medicare as only equipment that Medicare would only the DME suppliers the Medicare for 13 for the wheelchair and the for the wheelchair was no an the time the of the equipment to the Medicare need to the Medicare for the of the power wheelchairs. The Medicare has a is up in an and can be by the to the for the power wheelchair of the DME Medicare has described in their to the The DME are for for a or has DME that and numerous other for Medicare and work with suppliers of The to of the DME and the can be found on the of in the is and could be as most is the of often than the medical documentation and that the Medicare suppliers from for the power wheelchairs or even the wheelchairs. have an in this a is to in an the use of a to a physical an or even a seating and mobility specialist be as and many as to meet the the Medicare To access to the appropriate power wheelchairs or the was for power mobility on or after 1, in and is to be to an in the future The is not this has by the DME community. to thing the would to push in future an of the power mobility the of the the has that would the from to all and would it to include all power mobility including of other medical is that a scooter is the as a power scooter has a tiller and with a or is from a power wheelchair because the power have a typical wheelchair with the addition of a control in the arm a the to the are of power wheelchairs, the Medicare has 5 or of power wheelchairs. power wheelchair has The are on the wheelchair the technology that the wheelchair and the mobility needs it for the The for power wheelchair to that the the the more the power wheelchair The power wheelchairs have seating are and are of The 2 power wheelchairs are power wheelchairs with a or a rehabilitation The more 2 power wheelchair control with or power power wheelchair has seating with electronic and The power wheelchairs have that are not for use the home because they include or the to climb or have The 5 power wheelchairs are the power wheelchairs. the documentation for potential to the administrative burden for PM&R and some administrative burden for a typical PM&R practice with a seating would be to an for power wheelchairs evaluations complex rehabilitation technology the rehabilitation for these wheelchairs. The of the would be the of and DME suppliers who are can the name and for the companies by the the and finding the of suppliers the and the DME and the can the administrative burden of getting the wheelchair evaluation the require to the typical The of the DME including to it by the require and of the Medicare requirements. The evaluation can only be by the or a qualified and requires 2 to the and a with the or qualified the time between the evaluation and the DME the power wheelchair has been days but the can be for the DME to be the with a they have the step in the The would only need to meet with the and and all of the in the medical I was in time PM&R I would frequently that a qualified therapist the the mobility the documentation for wheelchairs and other of DME are becoming more it would for to having an independent therapist these seating and positioning these evaluations or with the of a therapist would be considered The utilization of a evaluation would the documentation and the administrative burden of the requirements. their evaluation time also can be Medicare evaluation the at the access for these wheelchairs, we are with the to The PM&R can that the who need the DME are to the equipment and those who not need the equipment are not a wheelchair to meet a and is to a power wheelchair or DME a for a the to meet the needs of the I PhD, at for his and on this and all of the DME and who while I this with to Jessica and
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reis et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: