Key result
Preoperative normovolemic hemodilution during aortic surgery resulted in new segmental wall motion abnormalities in 10% of patients compared to 40% in the control group (P = NS).
Why the study?
Does preoperative normovolemic hemodilution improve hemodynamics and segmental wall motion in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing abdominal aortic surgery?
RCT (n=20)
randomized
Does preoperative normovolemic hemodilution improve hemodynamics and segmental wall motion in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing abdominal aortic surgery?
Preoperative normovolemic hemodilution may improve hemodynamic tolerance to aortic clamping without worsening myocardial ischemia in patients with CAD undergoing aortic surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normovolemic hemodilution appears safe for myocardial ischemia; supports larger trials to confirm hemodynamic benefits during aortic clamping in CAD.
Preoperative normovolemic hemodilution (PNH) has been proposed for patients scheduled to undergo aortic surgery. Coronary artery disease is frequent in these patients. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of PNH on hemodynamics and segmental wall motion (SWM) evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography in such patients. Twenty patients with coronary artery disease were allocated randomly to either PNH or no PNH; PNH was performed after anesthetic induction using dextran 60,000. Patients were operated on under general anesthesia and monitored intraoperatively with electrocardiographic lead CM5, radial and pulmonary artery catheters, and transesophageal echocardiography positioned to obtain a short-axis view. Hemodynamic and transesophageal echocardiographic data were collected after anesthetic induction and after PNH, before and 5 min after aortic clamping, after unclamping, and at the end of surgery. Aortic clamping induced a significant increase in systemic vascular resistance and arteriovenous difference in oxygen and a decrease in cardiac index (P < 0.05), but the effect of aortic clamping was inversely related to hemodilution. The SWM score (graded from 1 = normal to 5 = dyskinesia) was significantly increased after aortic clamping, mainly in the anterior segment (P < 0.05). Four patients in the control (no PNH) group and one in the PNH group developed new SWM abnormalities indicative of myocardial ischemia during surgery (P = NS). This study suggests that PNH may improve hemodynamic tolerance to aortic clamping in patients with coronary artery disease. The observed changes in SWM indicate that PNH may not worsen myocardial ischemia in patients scheduled to undergo aortic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catoire et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in coronary artery disease scheduled for aortic surgery (n=20). Preoperative normovolemic hemodilution (PNH) vs. no PNH was evaluated on new segmental wall motion abnormalities indicative of myocardial ischemia during surgery (p=NS). Preoperative normovolemic hemodilution during aortic surgery resulted in new segmental wall motion abnormalities in 10% of patients compared to 40% in the control group (P = NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: