Why the study?
Data on aortic balloon occlusion in hemodynamically unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients are limited, requiring expert consensus on indications, timing, and techniques.
This international expert consensus provides recommendations on the indications, timing, and techniques for aortic balloon occlusion in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, supporting its selective use as a temporizing measure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support selective intra-aortic balloon occlusion in ruptured AAA repair; extends international expert consensus on indications and techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To report on the recommendations of an expert-based consensus on the indications, timing, and techniques of aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). METHODS: Eleven facilitators created appropriate statements regarding the study issues that were voted on using a 4-point Likert scale with open-comment fields, by a selected panel of international experts (vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists) using a 3-round modified Delphi consensus procedure (study period: January-April 2023). Based on the experts' responses, only the statements reaching grade A (full agreement ≥75%) or B (overall agreement ≥80% and full disagreement <5%) were included in the final study report. The consistency of each round's answers was also graded using Cohen's kappa, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and, in case of double resubmission, Fleiss kappa. RESULTS: Sixty-three experts were included in the final analysis and voted on 25 statements related to indication and timing (n=6), and techniques (n=19) of ABO in the setting of rAAA. Femoral sheath or ABO should be preferably placed in the operating room, via a percutaneous transfemoral access, on a stiff wire (grade B, consistency I), ABO placement should be suprarenal and last less than 30 minutes (grade B, consistency II), postoperative peripheral vascular status (grade A, consistency II) and laboratory testing every 6 to 12 hours (grade B, consistency) should be assessed to detect complications. Formal training for ABO should be implemented (grade B, consistency I). Most of the statements in this international expert-based Delphi consensus study might guide current choices for indications, timing, and techniques of ABO in the management of rAAA. Clinical practice guidelines should incorporate dedicated statements that can guide clinicians in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: At arrival and during both open or endovascular procedures for rAAA, selective use of intra-aortic balloon occlusion is recommended, and it should be performed preferably by the treating physician in aortic pathology.Clinical ImpactThis is the first consensus study of international vascular experts aimed at defining the indications, timing, and techniques of optimal use of ABO in the clinical setting of rAAA. Aortic occlusion by endovascular means (or ABO) is a quick procedure in properly trained hands that may play an important role as a temporizing measure until the definitive aortic repair is achieved, whether by endovascular or open means. Since data on its use in hemodynamically unstable patients are limited in the literature, owing to practical challenges in the performance of well-conducted prospective studies, understanding real-world use by experts is of importance in addressing critical issues and identifying main gaps in knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Oria et al. (2023) studied Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) (n=63). Aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) was evaluated on Consensus statements reaching grade A (full agreement ≥75%) or B (overall agreement ≥80% and full disagreement <5%). A panel of 63 international experts reached consensus on 25 statements recommending selective use of intra-aortic balloon occlusion during procedures for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: