Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals design approaches and reporting disparities in additively manufactured particle damping structures, highlighting critical gaps in experimental comparability.
AMPD supplementary material=========================== This archive accompanies the revised AMPD review for ADDLET-D-26-00133.It contains the public evidence table, search and classification protocol,reproducible MATLAB figure script, manuscript Figures 2-5, and supportingtab-separated data files. Search history--------------First search round completed: 2026-01-14Final update completed: 2026-06-12Historical number of records identified: Not availableHistorical number of records screened: Not availableHistorical number of records excluded during screening: Not availableRetained publication records in the evidence table: 108 Core files----------Supplementary_file_1_AMPD_evidence_table.xlsx Evidence table, analytical selection, classifications, performance summaries, reporting statuses, evidence-unit mapping, and quality checks. Supplementary_file_2_AMPD_search_mapping_and_figure_classification.pdf Search scope, eligibility rules, count levels, figure classifications, reporting definitions, comparability basis, and study limitations. Supplementary_file_3_make_ampd_figures.m Reproduces manuscript Figures 2-5. The script reads only the adjacent public workbook and writes only to the local generated_figures directory. generated_figures/ Figure_2.pdf and Figure_2.png: AMPD route map, 79 evidence units. Figure_3.pdf and Figure_3.png: direct-design matrix, 64 evidence units. Figure_4.pdf and Figure_4.png: evaluation methods and frequency evidence, 64 evidence units, including 60 with numeric frequency information and 4 without verified numeric frequency information. Figure_5.pdf and Figure_5.png: reporting status across 64 evidence units and 11 reporting fields. Supporting TSV files record the plotted entries, exclusions, count tables, classification bases, and figure-specific supporting summaries. Reproduction------------Keep the three core files together. RunSupplementary_file_3_make_ampd_figures.m in MATLAB R2024a or a compatiblerelease. Generated PDFs, PNGs, and TSVs are written to generated_figures.Existing files with the same public output names are replaced. Interpretation limits---------------------Evidence-unit counts and publication-record counts are different count levels.Performance metrics are retained in their source-defined forms and are notpooled across incompatible physical quantities. Not available means that therequested historical screening count cannot be reconstructed from the suppliedsource files.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: