Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational modeling reveals double-sided evacuation maximizes survival during subway tunnel fires, highlighting the need for low-level smoke extraction alongside sprinklers.
Subway tunnels exacerbate fire hazards, revealing a critical lacuna regarding the spatio-temporal coupling of fire progression and human egress. To address this, this study proposes and validates an Integrated Spatio-Temporal Risk Assessment Model to explicitly quantify survivability thresholds under complex fire dynamics. The framework synergizes Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) based Computational Fluid Dynamics with agent-based pedestrian trajectory modeling within a 3D tunnel featuring a 2% longitudinal gradient. Evaluating 9.5 MW and 12 MW fire energies, the model assessed Single-Sided Evacuation (SSE), Double-Sided Evacuation (DSE), and Sprinkler-Assisted Single-Sided Evacuation (SSE-S) across 2,160 agents. Hazards were quantified by continuously resolving Fractional Effective Dose (FED) indices, 60°C boundaries, and 500 ppm CO fronts. Simulations reveal the gradient induces a severe stack effect, accelerating toxic dispersion and yielding temperatures exceeding 1200°C. Consequently, SSE engendered fatal bottlenecks (FED: 15.33), whereas DSE optimized pedestrian flux, capping peak FED at 0.52. Crucially, while active suppression (SSE-S) extinguished flames within 105 seconds, thermodynamic cooling induced a paradoxical loss of smoke buoyancy, causing toxic layers to stratify at the breathing zone. Ultimately, while DSE and SSE-S are paramount for survivability, water-based suppression generates localized toxicological risks, necessitating the integration of low-level smoke detection and extraction architectures in future subterranean designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kırlangıçoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: