Key result
Point-of-care hs-cTnI pathway linked to ~67-minute reduction in emergency department length of stay.
Why the study?
POC hs-cTnI testing can reduce diagnostic turnaround in the ED, but real-world operational data remain mixed.
Does a point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin pathway with a shortened serial-sampling interval reduce emergency department length of stay in adult patients undergoing troponin testing?
Observational (n=1,381)
No
Does a point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin pathway with a shortened serial-sampling interval reduce emergency department length of stay in adult patients undergoing troponin testing?
Implementing a point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin pathway with a 0-2 hour serial sampling interval significantly reduced emergency department length of stay, particularly for patients requiring serial testing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May shorten ED stays in chest pain pathways; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BackgroundPoint-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing can reduce diagnostic turnaround in the emergency department (ED), but real-world operational data remain mixed.MethodsObservational before-after service evaluation at a high-volume UK tertiary ED (Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow; ∼200,000 attendances/year). On 12 November 2025 a new chest-pain pathway combined bedside POC hs-cTnI (Abbott i-STAT Alinity) with a reduction in the serial-sampling interval from 0-3 to 0-2 hours, via an immediate hard switch; disposition thresholds were unchanged. The primary outcome was ED length of stay (LOS); interrupted time series (ITS) assessed the temporal association with implementation.ResultsOf 1381 attendances (718 pre- and 663 post-implementation), median LOS fell from 382 to 319 minutes (-63; p < 0.001), and from 510 to 335 minutes among serial-testing patients (-175; Wilcoxon p < 0.001). Four-hour breach fell from 78.8% to 67.3% overall (-11.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.2 to -6.9) and from 95.7% to 72.7% in serial testers. ITS showed an immediate level change at go-live (-144 minutes; p < 0.001); estimated capacity released ∼51 bed-hours/day.ConclusionImplementing this POC-based pathway was temporally associated with immediate reductions in ED LOS and 4-hour breach, greatest among serial-testing patients. Benefit is likely greatest where overcrowding and slow laboratory turnaround coexist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1,381). Point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing (0-2 hour pathway) vs. Central-laboratory testing (0-3 hour pathway) was evaluated on Emergency department length of stay (LOS) (MD -67 minutes, 95% CI -92.8 to -41.3, p=<0.001). Implementing a point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin pathway reduced mean emergency department length of stay by 67 minutes compared to standard laboratory testing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: