Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study demonstrates early continuous glucose monitoring improves 5-year glycemic trajectories in youth with type 1 diabetes, supporting routine early adoption after diagnosis.
Purpose: The long-term impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) initiation on glycemic trajectories in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains unclear. We assessed 5-year glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) trajectories according to CGM initiation timing in Korean children and adolescents with T1D. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with T1D at ≤18 years between 2015 and 2024 at a single pediatric diabetes center. Patients were categorized by CGM initiation timing (<1 month, 1-<12 months, ≥12 months, or no-CGM use). HbA1c was assessed at prespecified intervals up to 60 months, and adjusted trajectories and rates of change were estimated with linear mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements within patients. Results: Among 216 patients (mean follow-up, 61.3 ± 34.8 months), 69.9% used CGM and 40.7% initiated within 1 month of diagnosis. Baseline HbA1c was higher in the early-CGM group than in the delayed/no-CGM group (12.5% [IQR, 11.0-13.9] vs 11.1% [IQR, 8.8-13.2]; p<0.001), but converged within 12 months. Median HbA1c at 60 months was 6.8%, 6.8%, 7.7%, and 7.3% in the <1-month, 1-<12-month, ≥12-month, and no-CGM groups; the proportion achieving HbA1c <7.0% fell from 86.4% at 9 months to 47.1% at 60 months in the no-CGM group, which alone showed a rising trajectory in mixed-effects models (+0.27% per year; p<0.001). Conclusion: Early CGM initiation after T1D diagnosis was associated with more favorable 5-year HbA1c trajectories compared with delayed initiation or no CGM use, supporting routine early CGM adoption in pediatric T1D management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: