Key result
Clinic-based onabotulinumtoxinA injections cost ~$1,899, substantially less than hospital outpatient or operating room settings.
Why the study?
To identify component-level drivers of cost variability for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for overactive bladder across office-based clinic, tertiary operating room, and hospital outpatient department settings.
What are the component-level drivers of cost variability for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections across different procedural settings?
Observational (n=1,939)
What are the component-level drivers of cost variability for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections across different procedural settings?
Cost variability for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections differs substantially across procedural settings, suggesting cost-containment efforts should target setting-specific variance drivers.
Clinic settings linked to lower onabotulinumtoxinA injection costs; leaves open whether redirecting procedures yields net savings without compromising outcomes.
PURPOSE: To identify component-level drivers of cost variability for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injections for overactive bladder across office-based clinic, tertiary operating room (OR), and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cost analysis of BTX-A injection encounters from January 2020 to June 2025 using institutional activity-based cost accounting data. Costs were grouped into procedural components and categorized as direct or indirect. Mean costs were compared using Welch's t-tests with Bonferroni correction. Utilization-adjusted variance decomposition identified component-level drivers of cost variability. RESULTS: The cohort included 322 tertiary OR, 125 HOPD, and 1,492 clinic encounters. Mean total costs were $4,633.87 in the tertiary OR, $5,063.32 in the HOPD, and $1,899.01 in clinic. Total cost variability differed by setting. In the tertiary OR, variability was driven by supplies (29.5%), OR time (25.7%), and post-anesthesia recovery (25.5%), while direct cost variability was dominated by supplies (45.1%) and indirect variability by OR time (56.0%). In the HOPD, total cost variability was driven by OR time (41.2%), anesthesia (29.2%), and recovery (16.1%), with similar drivers of indirect variability. In clinic, total and direct cost variability were driven primarily by cystoscopy (63.9% and 68.7%) and BTX-A (36.1% and 31.3%), while indirect variability was driven by BTX-A (65.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Cost variability differs substantially across procedural settings. Cost-containment efforts should target setting-specific variance drivers rather than mean costs or site of service alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Overactive bladder (n=1,939). Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injections vs. Tertiary OR vs HOPD vs clinic settings was evaluated on Mean total costs and component-level drivers of cost variability. Mean total costs for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections varied by setting ($4,634 in OR, $5,063 in HOPD, $1,899 in clinic), with different component-level variance drivers across sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: