Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reveals mid-temporal visual field loss predicts combined eyelid-brow surgery in ptosis patients, indicating an objective marker that reduces revision rates.
Introduction: Determining when to perform combined eyelid and brow surgery for functional deficits remains subjective, despite measurable visual field (VF) impairment in affected patients. Objectives: We sought to identify VF patterns associated with selection for combined eyelid-brow surgery. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study Methods: Patients with preoperative Humphrey Visual Field testing undergoing isolated eyelid surgery or combined eyelid-brow surgery for VF deficits were matched 1:2 by demographic and surgical characteristics. VF patterns were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Results: Among 171 patients, the mid-temporal VF zone was the only independent predictor of combined-repair selection on multivariable analysis (OR=1.38 per dot missed, 95% CI 1.06–1.81, p=0.018). Combined repair was also independently associated with lower odds of need for revision surgery (OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.97, p=0.044). Conclusions: The mid-temporal VF may serve as a marker of brow-related visual obstruction, helping guide selection for combined eyelid-brow surgery in functional blepharoptosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stein et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: