Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genomic and phenotypic analysis reveals potent antimicrobial traits in sandstorm-derived Bacillus, indicating airborne dust serves as a promising reservoir for novel bioactive discovery.
Background/Objectives: Bacillus spp. are often isolated from airborne microbiota. Five Bacillus strains (AD12–16) isolated from dust during a sandstorm in Kuwait were characterized for their potential to produce antimicrobial compounds, biosurfactants and siderophores by genotypic and phenotypic approaches. Methods: Whole-genome sequencing was performed, and biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were predicted using antiSMASH. Antimicrobial activities were determined by agar-well diffusion assays. Siderophore and biosurfactant production were determined by Arnow’s and drop-collapse assays, respectively. The active metabolites were separated, fractionated, and analyzed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and LC–MS/MS. Results: Genome mining identified many BGCs associated with known secondary metabolites such as bacillibactin and bacilysin, as well as a number of unassigned clusters. The isolates exhibited distinct antimicrobial profiles, with Bacillus subtilis AD16 displaying the highest antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Biosurfactant- and siderophore-associated activities varied among the isolates. Active fractions demonstrated bactericidal activity, while LC–MS/MS analysis revealed molecular features tentatively assigned to siderophore- and lipopeptide-associated metabolite classes based on accurate mass and MS/MS fragmentation patterns. Conclusions: The combination of unassigned BGCs, antimicrobial activity, and incompletely characterized molecular features highlights unexplored biosynthetic potential in sandstorm-derived Bacillus. Further purification and structural characterization are required to establish the identities and biological functions of the active metabolites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dashti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: