Conceptual analysis uncovers shared frameworks for non-human rights in ecological jurisprudence, highlighting legal restitution for environmental harm.
This essay argues that the ecological crisis demands a reconstruction of the classical concept of soul — and, independently of it, a jurisprudence of rights extending to non human beings. It rethinks six commitments of the Aristotelian soul-hierarchy and shows that Deloria's critique of the "Greek" lineage — essence-first, dead-matter, human-as-measure — is one Ṣadrā's own revolution of existence over essence had already made from within, while the Qurʾānic doctrine of universal glorification (Q 17:44, "but you do not understand their glorification") grounds an epistemology of reverent, partial attention convergent with Deloria's method. The essay's central claim is juridical: in both traditions the non-human world is not material awaiting valuation but witness already speaking, and testimony finds its home in the court. Drawing on the Twelver hadith corpus and Javadi Amoli's Mafātīḥ al-Ḥayāt, it documents this covenantal structure at three levels — the fiqh of animal rights (food, rest, lineage, friendship, and the ḥurma of the face that "glorifies God with praise"), and shows the awaited Mahdī's renewal (rajʿa) to be not a supernatural supplement but the lifting of the withholding: the earth restored to its rights. On animal souls it proposes a Ṣadrian settlement: survival itself is graded, individual continuance remains open, yet no suffering is metaphysically inconsequential, since all accounts are settled. It concludes with a disciplined pluriverse — ontologies bound by shared juridical structure and mutual correction of failure modes — and the practical grammar this yields: liability and restitution to the wronged population, the daily ṣadaqa of the commons, and environmental enforcement (ḥisba) re-founded on the rights of water, air, and soil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altaf Ali (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: