Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey shows improved cyber fraud detection through continuous auditing and forensic accounting in commercial banks, highlighting the necessity of integrated monitoring.
The increasing complexity of digital banking has created new opportunities for cyber-enabled financial fraud in Nigerian DM banks, necessitating effective mechanisms for timely detection and investigation. This study examined the effects of continuous auditing and FA on cyber-enabled financial fraud detection. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. The population comprised 584 relevant staff of five selected deposit money banks in Calabar, Cross River State, from which a sample of 237 respondents was determined using the Taro Yamane formula. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. The findings showed that continuous auditing had a positive and significant effect on cyber-enabled financial fraud detection (β = 0.512, t = 7.70, p < .001), while forensic accounting also had a positive and significant effect (β = 0.388, t = 5.84, p < .001). The two variables jointly had a significant effect on fraud detection (F = 91.82, p < .001), explaining 51.7% of its variation (R² = 0.517). The study concluded that integrating continuous auditing with FA strengthens cyber-enabled financial fraud detection. Banks should invest in automated monitoring, forensic expertise, and digital investigation capabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: