Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
System evaluation demonstrates 100% emergency recall using layered guardrails for health queries, indicating hybrid architectures prevent critical medical triage errors.
Large language model (LLM) assistants that answer health questions face an asymmetric error cost: failing to recognise a medical emergency can cause serious harm, whereas an unnecessary escalation costs only inconvenience. We present the safety layer of HealthSense AI, a multi-agent health information assistant, and describe a layered guardrail in which a deterministic keyword screen routes each input, an LLM classifier makes the final decision on every input, and the deterministic layer serves as a fail-safe floor whenever the classifier cannot run. A second, independent guardrail screens generated output. We evaluate the design on 87 cases across two test rounds: a 56-case red-team suite written alongside the guardrail, and a 31-case independent set written from how people actually describe emergencies — lay somatic language, apologetic hedging, non-native English. The final system achieves 100% emergency recall (46/46), zero false alarms on 28 safe inputs and outputs, and 100% recall on 13 unsafe outputs. We also report two failures found during development: a keyword whitelist that scored perfectly on the suite it was built against but wrongly blocked 6 of 10 safe questions on the independent set, and a silent regression in which the LLM classifier was disabled without raising an error. Both shaped the final design. All code and test cases are public.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
chaudhuri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: