Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates high-accuracy key-value extraction in Arabic invoices, indicating effective layout-aware document understanding.
Arabic invoice processing requires not only recognition of generic entities, but also interpretation of their invoice-specific roles and relations. This article extends a YOLOv11–AraBERT active-learning pipeline with a layout-aware structural layer for field classification, key-value linking, and product line-item reconstruction. YOLOv11 localizes text regions in a custom Arabic invoice dataset, OCR converts the detected regions to text, and AraBERT performs sequence labeling with an entity inventory that includes PRODUCT. Layout-AraBERT then combines AraBERT representations, predicted entity types, and normalized two-dimensional bounding-box features to distinguish fields such as invoice date, tax amount, subtotal, total amount, product name, quantity, unit price, and line total. On the authors’ custom dataset, YOLOv11 reaches 93.42% mAP@0.5:0.95 and the final AraBERT active-learning batch reaches 89.36% entity-level F1. PRODUCT extraction reaches 87.77% F1. For the structural stage, Layout-AraBERT reaches 91.2% field accuracy and 88.7% key-value linking F1 under clean OCR conditions; at a 20% synthetic OCR-noise level these values decrease to 81.6% and 78.2%, respectively. Evaluation also includes cross-template generalization, ablation analysis, and annotation-efficiency measurements. The resulting framework provides a reference baseline for layout-aware Arabic invoice understanding on the authors’ custom dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahdhaoui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: