Theoretical analysis explores therapeutic presence in person-centred psychotherapy, suggesting presence is a developmental refinement of being there.
Rogers’ account of ‘One more characteristic’, from which this is abridged, stirs me greatly. The image here of man’s potential runs close to my deepest values. I find it beautiful in its simplicity. I also know that sculpting one’s growth to develop this capacity requires committed willingness and courage to draw upon one’s full humanness, over a lifetime. I think what Rogers meant by Presence lies along the same continuum as what I am going to call Being There. My is that Presence is an ascendant of Being There (or more correctly of Being There-ness). By this I mean that for the therapist Presence is a developmental refinement of the ability to Be There. However, I shall attempt to define what I mean by Being There. Being There is an elusive something I have glimpsed and I want to use this paper to try to pin it down, and to explore how this way of being — which for me has deep personal significance — fits with the Person-Centred approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pam Janecka (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: