Experimental study reveals improved surface quality and compressive strength in steam-cured concrete using defoamer-modified mould release agents, indicating distinct optima for strength and pore...
Steam curing is widely used for precast concrete, but mixtures containing polycarboxylate ether superplasticiser often develop surface bugholes and coarser pores near the mould-contact region. This study examined whether a water-based mould release agent (MRA) modified with a defoamer based on mineral oil (ODA) or a polyol-based defoamer (ADA) could improve the surface quality of steam-cured concrete. Concrete compressive strength, demoulded surface appearance and rebound-based near-surface uniformity were assessed. Steam-cured mortar was used to compare image-based pore characteristics in the mould-contact region and the interior. The image-based pore-structure response was more evident in the mould-contact near-surface region than in the interior. Compared with the blank group, ADA-6 (0.6% defoamer by mass of the MRA) increased the demoulded and 28-day compressive strengths by 21.84% and 10.13%, respectively, whereas ADA-9 (0.9% defoamer) gave the greatest near-surface pore refinement, reducing the mean pore diameter from 0.67 mm to 0.26 mm and the porosity from 6.58% to 1.63%. ODA was more dosage-sensitive, and complete replacement of the MRA reduced the 28-day strength by 15.70%. The results indicate that defoamer-modified water-based MRAs can improve demoulded surface quality, but strength and surface pore refinement should be optimised separately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: