Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative document analysis reveals ChatGPT supports basic systems thinking in high school science curricula, highlighting the enduring necessity of teacher expertise for depth and accuracy.
This study explores the potential of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), specifically ChatGPT, in supporting the design of socioscientific issues (SSI) unit plans that foster systems thinking in high school science education. Employing document analysis, we systematically examined a series of outputs generated by ChatGPT 3.5 to produce an instructional unit focused on cross-state air pollution. Activities were coded using Stave and Hopper’s systems thinking taxonomy to assess the depth of student engagement with systems thinking. ChatGPT generated a structured SSI unit plan that provided opportunities for students to practice basic levels of systems thinking. However, GenAI outputs typically lacked specificity and contained inaccuracies. Iterative prompting led to incremental improvements but did not substantively elevate the complexity of systems thinking tasks. Teacher expertise and critical engagement remain essential for ensuring accuracy, depth, and pedagogical value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courchesne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: